The best thing about summer

The best thing about summer.

 

Oh, me too. I love that I get all kinds of uninterrupted reading time. I read by the pool, I read in the pool, I read on the couch, I read at coffee shops. Oh my, heavenly. I also have a spectacularly long list of books to read, some of which I have been saving up since September. I do have a class through until the end of July, so I’ll be reading for that too, but since I am only working 3 days (THREE DAYS! WOW! That’s just AWESOME!!!!!) in July, I should be able to manage my nice long TBR list as well as my class list.  Keep an eye here to see how that’s going! You can also friend me on Goodreads, by the way: http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/974392-jessica

Happy reading!

Judging a book by its cover

I spent some time at the bookstore today. I finished up the John Green book that I was reading while I was waiting for my car to be serviced. (Oy that was an expensive proposition.) I managed to leave the bookstore without buying any books, although I did buy a magazine. I don’t think that counts. But oh, was I tempted! There were so many books that looked so good, so interesting, and I wanted to try them all.

I will admit to judging a book by its cover. I think that almost everyone does, even though they won’t admit to it – it’s something that we’re not supposed to do. Not for people, certainly, but I think that for books…well, that’s a different story. First of all, the publishers want us to judge the book by the cover. Or at least, they want us to buy the book based on our immediate reaction to the cover. Otherwise, why would they spend so much time, money and effort on making such beautiful covers? The bookstore is filled with gorgeous books that have all kinds of artistry on the front. There are titles that are shimmery, as if painted with silver or gold, covers that have mysterious shapes and smokey backgrounds, others that show attractive couples holding hands, hugging each other, or standing aloof from each other. Each cover is designed to gain our attention, to pull us out from inside our heads and draw us in. We are meant to pick up the book, examine the beauty of the cover, flip it over and read the blurb on the back. We are meant to feel the weight of the book in our hands. Some books are published on extra heavy paper for just that reason. And they are priced accordingly. We are then meant to open up the book and examine the pages within. Are the margins wide enough (or narrow enough, depending on how you view it)? Is the font pleasing to the eye? Is the type face too big or too small, or, as baby bear would like it, just right? How do the pages feel between the fingers as you turn them?

All of these things are designed to pull you into the book, to get you to bring it to the front of the bookstore and plunk down a fistful of cash (or credit, debit, gift card or whatever your preferred method of payment may be). They want you to buy their books. The authors want you to read the book, they want you to love the book, they want you to share that love with other people. The publisher wants you to buy it.

Which is why they want you to judge that book by its cover. Because if you didn’t, then you wouldn’t be interested enough to pick it up in the first place.

Image

Consider the new marketing of Wuthering Heightsand other classics. They have been re-released with new covers that look an awful lot like the covers of the Twilight series. They’re placed especially in the Young Adult section (or at least they are in my Barnes & Noble), and if you glance at them alongside the Twilight books, they are difficult to distinguish from each other. The covers are black, with a rose or camellia or some other flower on the front. Just like the Twilight books.

It’s brilliant.

Because the customer will pick up the book thinking that it’s a new book in the series, and then they’ll see that it’s something else entirely. Hopefully they’ll be intrigued enough to read the back, flip through the pages, maybe even take that book home with them.

See? They want you to judge the book by its cover.

I am curious to know how well that’s working for the publishers, by the way. Are they actually getting more book sales this way? Are people suddenly reading more Emily Bronte because it looks like a Stephanie Meyer book? Or are the potential readers putting the books back down again as soon as they realize that it’s not the book they thought it was?

Curious questions, indeed.

So I put to you the following: we are meant to judge people by the strength of their character (to paraphrase…), by the person beneath the skin. We are meant to purchase a book based on a judgement of its cover. We are meant to fall in love with the contents of the book once we get it home. But we wouldn’t take the book home if we hadn’t originally judged that book by its cover.

Book Review – Looking for Alaska

I just finished reading “Looking for Alaska” by John Green. Now, I have already mentioned John Green before on this blog (here and here), so you may have realized that I have an enormous crush on him. While reading this book that crush grew exponentially. The book was beautiful. It was hilarious. It was sad (I cried at least twice). Remember that episode of Friends when Rachel looks in Joey’s freezer and sees that he’s keeping a book in there? The book is there because Joey puts it there when the story got too scary. For reasons that I don’t remember at the moment, they each decide to read the other’s favorite book, so Rachel reads The Shining, and Joey reads Little Women. I seem to recall that at the end of the episode, they put Little Women in the freezer because Joey gets to be part of the book where one of the character dies. Why am I recounting all of this? Because as I was reading Looking for Alaska, I was totally have a “freezer” moment.** I was reading the book on my Kindle, so I didn’t actually put the book in the freezer, but I did actually have to wrench myself away for a while because I was just so overwrought by the book. Actually, overwrought would be an overstatement. If there is such a word as “wrought”, then that is what I was. I was wrapped up in the story, in the characters, and I was thoroughly loving the book every single moment, although I did not see the climax of the story coming. I will not say another word about that, as I don’t wish to spoil the book for you.

The writing was wonderful. The characters were wonderful. I love the idea of having a friend called “The Colonel.” I love that he automatically gave the narrator a new name the second he walked in the room. At one point late in the book, they referred to the narrator by his given name, and I stopped and asked myself “Who the heck is Miles…ooohhh, right, that’s Pudge’s actual name.” The way the book is structured is unique and interesting. The first half of the book is hilariously funny – I laughed out loud at several points – while the second half of the book is sad, gut-wrenching and yet still funny. I love the way John Green writes. As I’ve been watching his Crash Course videos over the last few weeks, I very much have his voice in my head, and that’s the voice that I heard as I read the book.

I did not know anything about the book when I first started reading it, other than the fact that it was written by John Green. The question and answer section after the end of the book mentions that parts of the story are autobiographical, but the author interview doesn’t go into much more detail than that. I think that this is probably the best way to read the book, because the only preconceived notion I had about the book was the above-mentioned crush. <grin>

I would like to be able to write like John Green one day. He has a love of the English language, and a talent for weaving words into beautiful sentences. While the descriptive parts of the book are very clearly in his voice, the characters speak in their own distinct voices. The speech patterns and cadences differ with each person, and even if you have put down the book for a while (which I had to do while I finished up a paper for grad school), when you pick it up again, even if you’re mid-chapter and have no idea who is speaking at first, you pick it up quickly again because of the way the characters talk.

My new mission is to go out and read everything that John Green has ever written. Oh, and to hope that one day he will miraculously show up on my doorstep, profess undying love for me and sweep me off my feet.

You know, totally realistic.

OK, so the first part is. I’ll go out and read everything he’s ever written. Maybe one day I’ll be able to write with a tenth of the talent that he has. The only sour note – in the author interview when asked what talent he has, Green’s answer is a self-deprecating “I’m good at finding and remembering trivia.” I know that to really answer that truthfully would make him sound conceited, however, I think it’s a bit disingenuous for him to say that is his only talent. He is an amazingly talented writer and has a gift with words. I think he should have at least given a nod to that in some way in the interview. A quibble, I know. I’m prepared to forgive him.

**I must include apologies. In doing a search online for the particular Friends episode I was thinking about, I came across this post. I wrote my post before I saw this particular post, but the similarities are pretty startling.

Stupid is as stupid does…

One of my students was upset today because she had done poorly on two tests. She spent a lot of time berating herself because she was “stupid.” This got me thinking about my students and the weight that they give to tests. Many of my students are bright, high achieving individuals. They are successful because when they come to my class, they try to do their best (most of the time. Sometimes they behave like kids. Because they’re teenagers. I expect them to be silly – I would worry if they weren’t). It saddens me to think that anyone can think that their abilities can be measured by one or even two tests. Two failed tests does not make you stupid. In fact, even failing ALL the tests doesn’t make you stupid. Did my student have a bad day? Yes. Was she overloaded with tests last week? Yes. Did she do the best she could? Maybe, maybe not. But she stayed after school with me until 4pm today working on test corrections. She asked questions about the ones she missed so she could understand the material better. She worked steadily for about an hour and a half, and I think she learned something more about history.

I hope that at some point in the near future, she will also realize that she learned something else: a test does not determine who you are. A test measures what you were able to do on a particular subject at a particular moment in time. I hope that she realizes that because she stayed, asked questions and learned something new about history, she is in fact the complete opposite of stupid.

If Queen Victoria had a scrapbook…

I just found this lovely website: an online scrapbook of Queen Victoria. The site was created by the British Monarchy website (click here for the main site), and it designed to look just like an actual scrapbook. It has images, letters, maps and even some actual film footage from her Diamond Jubilee in 1897! I was astonished to see that there was film footage – it boggles the mind to realize that she was crowned in the middle of the 19th century, before the American Civil War, and lived through until the beginning of the last century. And here we are, in our living rooms and bedrooms learning about her on the internet at the dawn of the our century. It’s weird to realize that while the world was such a different place then, we are not really that far away from it. I wonder what Victoria would make of the world today?
Thanks to Two Nerdy History Girls for the link to the site!